<p>Lemon Grove voters will decide this November whether to ban the commercial sale of birds within the city.</p>
<p>The initiative would replace lawful retail bird sales with a rescue-only model.</p>
<p>AFA supports high standards of avian care, responsible ownership, education, and enforcement against neglect.</p>
<p>However, this measure takes the wrong approach by using a blanket ban instead of addressing poor care where it occurs.</p>
<p>If specific businesses are failing to meet proper standards, those concerns should be handled through inspections, enforcement, care requirements, and accountability. A broad ban does not distinguish between poor operators and responsible aviculturists who provide education, healthy birds, proper care guidance, and long-term support for bird owners.</p>
<p>A rescue-only model may sound compassionate, but it may not be able to meet public demand or guarantee better outcomes for birds. Bird rescues already face capacity challenges, and banning lawful local sales does not eliminate demand. It may push people toward online sellers, informal sales, or sources with less oversight.</p>
<p>Responsible aviculture is part of the solution. Birds are best protected through education, standards, responsible ownership, inspections, and enforcement against neglect — not blanket bans.</p>