Thank you for taking action!

Please consider sharing this page with your networks


Billdata Timeline
01.02.2018
bill:introduced, bill:reading:1: House
Filed for intro.
01.02.2018
bill:introduced: House
Intro.
01.02.2018
bill:introduced: Senate
Introduced, Passed on First Consideration
01.02.2018
bill:introduced, bill:reading:1: Senate
Filed for introduction
05.02.2018
: House
P1C.
05.02.2018
: Senate
Passed on Second Consideration, refer to Senate Judiciary Committee
07.02.2018
committee:referred: House
Assigned to s/c Civil Justice Subcommittee
07.02.2018
committee:referred: House
P2C, ref. to Civil Justice Committee
07.03.2018
: House
Placed on s/c cal Civil Justice Subcommittee for 3/14/2018
14.03.2018
: House
Placed on s/c cal Civil Justice Subcommittee for 3/21/2018
14.03.2018
: House
Action Def. in s/c Civil Justice Subcommittee to 3/21/2018
21.03.2018
: House
Placed on cal. Civil Justice Committee for 3/27/2018
21.03.2018
committee:referred: House
Rec for pass if am by s/c ref. to Civil Justice Committee
27.03.2018
committee:passed:favorable: House
Rec. for pass. if am., ref. to Finance, Ways & Means Committee
28.03.2018
: House
Placed on s/c cal Finance, Ways & Means Subcommittee for 4/3/2018
28.03.2018
committee:referred: House
Assigned to s/c Finance, Ways & Means Subcommittee
28.03.2018
: Senate
Placed on Senate Judiciary Committee calendar for 4/3/2018
03.04.2018
: House
Action Def. in s/c Finance, Ways & Means Subcommittee to Next Calendar
03.04.2018
: Senate
Failed in Senate Judiciary Committee / no second
04.04.2018
: House
Placed on s/c cal Finance, Ways & Means Subcommittee for 4/9/2018
09.04.2018
: House
Taken off notice for cal in s/c Finance, Ways & Means Subcommittee of Finance, Ways & Means Committee
More
  • Action icon email
  • email advocacy
  • 356 / 500 have signed

Vote NO on HB2620 on March 27

Please, vote NO on HB2620 on March 27 when it comes up in the Civil Justice Committee.

The bill is wrong on principle. The State of Tennessee should not have to pay for the court settlements that are a consequence of the policies and actions of local school districts.

The bill will be expensive to the State.  On January 12, The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel noted that the Kenosha, Wisconsin United School District agreed to pay $800,000 to settle a federal lawsuit brought by transgender student Ash Whitaker.  If local school districts in Tennessee believe that the State will pick up the tab, where will the expense end?

The bill does not represent the values of Tennessee.  77 Tennessee clergy and religious leaders have signed the following statement:

"As clergy and leaders of faith communities, we oppose SB2480/HB2620. Using the resources of state government to defend school districts that engage in discrimination is opposed to our values and it undercuts the important work of building just communities in Tennessee."

These clergy come from Johnson City, Oak Ridge, Gallatin, Murfreesboro, Tullahoma, Ashland City, Mt. Juliet, Bristol, Clarksville, Maryville, Smithville, Knoxville, Chattanooga, Nashville, Madison, Brentwood, Memphis, and Old Hickory.

This bill compromises Tennessee's economic development efforts.  North Carolina endured millions of dollars in consequences from its bathroom bill.  Tennessee must remain a job-creating leader.  This bill paints a target on our state, inviting boycotts and other repurcussions.

HB2620 is wrong for all these reasons.  Thank you for considering my views.