Thank you for taking action!

Please consider sharing this page with your networks and go to TNEP.org to offer your support.


Billdata Timeline
15.01.2020
bill:reading:1, bill:introduced: House
Filed for introduction
21.01.2020
bill:reading:1, bill:introduced: Senate
Filed for introduction
22.01.2020
bill:introduced: House
Intro., P1C.
22.01.2020
bill:introduced: Senate
Introduced, Passed on First Consideration
23.01.2020
committee:referred: House
Assigned to s/c K-12 Subcommittee
23.01.2020
committee:referred: House
P2C, ref. to Education
23.01.2020
: Senate
Passed on Second Consideration, refer to Senate Education Committee
04.03.2020
: House
Placed on s/c cal K-12 Subcommittee for 3/10/2020
10.03.2020
committee:referred: House
Rec for pass if am by s/c ref. to Education Committee
11.03.2020
: House
Placed on cal. Education Committee for 3/18/2020
11.03.2020
: Senate
Placed on Senate Education Committee calendar for 3/16/2020
16.03.2020
: Senate
Action deferred in Senate Education Committee
18.03.2020
: House
Meeting Canceled
20.05.2020
: House
Placed on cal. Education Committee for 5/28/2020
27.05.2020
: Senate
Placed on Senate Education Committee calendar for 6/3/2020
28.05.2020
: House
Placed on cal. Calendar & Rules Committee for 5/29/2020
28.05.2020
committee:passed:favorable: House
Rec. for pass. if am., ref. to Calendar & Rules Committee
29.05.2020
: House
H. Placed on Regular Calendar for 6/2/2020
03.06.2020
: House
Engrossed; ready for transmission to Sen.
03.06.2020
bill:passed: House
Passed H., as am., Ayes 73, Nays 13, PNV 2
03.06.2020
amendment:passed: House
H. adopted am. (Amendment 1 - HA0753)
03.06.2020
: Senate
Action deferred in Senate Education Committee to 12/1/2020
08.06.2020
bill:introduced: House
Received from House, Passed on First Consideration
More
  • Action icon email
  • email advocacy
  • 234 / 250 have signed

Vote NO on HB1689 on March 10

I am writing to ask members of the K-12 subcommittee to vote NO on HB1689 on March 10 and for all the co-sponsors to withdraw their support for the bill.

I oppose the exclusion of transgender students from school athletics.  Everyone deserves the opportunity to participate and draw on their strengths and talents.  The law should not be used to stigmatize a group of students, nor should it be used to micromanage school athletics.

This bill would create a bureaucratic and legal quagmire for schools as they try to maintain student privacy while using birth certificates or genetic testing to establish a student's gender. 

Birth certificates--Many students move to Tennessee from other states.  The states have varied policies on amended birth certificates.  In some states, the amended birth certificate becomes the only birth certificate available. 

DNA or genetic testing--Just like obtaining a birth certificate, there is a cost for the student's family to have a DNA or genetic test.  We should not add to a family's financial burden.  Schools will have to put in place new policies and systems to maintain records of birth certificates and genetic test results.  There is a strong risk that these student records will be used for purposes other than athletics and result in privacy violations.  The Legislature needs to weigh these risks with respect to HIPAA and FERPA, too. 

Texas has tried this policy with failing results. Consider the example of transgender wrestler Mack Beggs.  Though he wanted to wrestle in the boys' division, he was forced to wrestle in the girls' division, where he won two state titles, because his birth certificate said he was female.

This bill is detrimental to students and creates numerous headaches for school personnel.

Thank you for considering my views.

 Check this box to stay updated on this issue
  • Action icon email
  • email advocacy
  • 188 / 250 have signed

Vote NO on SB1736/HB1689 in Committee

This bill prevents transgender and non-binary students from participating in school sports according to their gender identity. It's wrong to use the law to target transgender and non-binary students.